Paper detail

Column collapse of granular rods

We find the collapse of columns of granular rods to show range of behaviors that depends on particle aspect ratio (length $L$ to diameter $d$) and initial pile geometry (height/radius). For all aspect ratios $L/d$ below 24 there exists a critical height at $L/4$ below which the pile acts as a solid, maintaining its initial shape, and a second critical height at $3L/4$ above which the pile always collapses like an ordinary granular material. Separating the critical heights is a transition region in which the probability of collapse increases linearly from 0 to 1. This behavior is independent of particle length, width, or aspect ratio. When the pile does collapse, the runoff radius $r_f$ scales as a power-law with dimensionless height $\tilde H$, agreeing with previous experiments on ordinary sand. For low piles the scaling is linear, with $r_f\sim \tilde H^{1.2\pm 0.1}$. Above a critical pile aspect ratio (pile height/radius) this switches to a square-root scaling, with $H^{0.6\pm0.1}$.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.