Paper detail

Colouring bottomless rectangles and arborescences

We study problems related to colouring bottomless rectangles. One of our main results shows that for any positive integers $m, k$, there is no semi-online algorithm that can $k$-colour bottomless rectangles with disjoint boundaries in increasing order of their top sides, so that any $m$-fold covered point is covered by at least two colours. This is, surprisingly, a corollary of a stronger result for arborescence colourings. Any semi-online colouring algorithm that colours an arborescence in leaf-to-root order with a bounded number of colours produces arbitrarily long monochromatic paths. This is complemented by optimal upper bounds given by simple online colouring algorithms from other directions. Our other main results study configurations of bottomless rectangles in an attempt to improve the \textit{polychromatic $k$-colouring number}, $m_k^*$. We show that for many families of bottomless rectangles, such as unit-width bottomless rectangles, $m_k^*$ is linear in $k$. We also present an improved lower bound for general families: $m_k^* \geq 2k-1$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.