Paper detail

Color Magnitude Relation and Morphology of Low-Redshift ULIRGs in SDSS

We present color-magnitude and morphological analysis of 54 low-redshift ULIRGs, a subset of the IRAS 1Jy sample (Kim & Sanders, 1998), in the SDSS. The ULIRGs are on average 1 magnitude brighter in M0.1r than the SDSS galaxies within the same redshift range. The majority of the ULIRGs (~87%) have the colors typical of the blue cloud, and only 4 sources (~7%) are located in the red sequence. While ULIRGs are popularly thought to be precursors to a QSO phase, we find few (~6%) in the "green valley" where the majority of the X-ray and IR selected AGNs are found, and none of which harbors an AGN. For the 14 previously spectroscopic identified AGNs (~28%), we perform PSF subtractions and find that on average the central point sources contribute less than one third to the total luminosity, and that their high optical luminosities and overall blue colors are apparently the result of star formation activity of the host galaxies. Visual inspection of the SDSS images reveals a wide range of disturbed morphologies. A detailed morphology analysis using Gini and M20 coefficients shows that slightly less than one half (~42% in g band) of the ULIRGs are located in the region where most local mergers are found. The heterogeneous distribution of ULIRGs in the G-M20 space is qualitatively consistent with the results found by numerical simulations of disk-disk mergers. Our study also shows that the measured morphological parameters are systematically affected by the SNR and thus the merging galaxies can appear at various regions in the G-M20 space. In general, our results reinforce the view that ULIRGs contain young stellar populations and are mergers in progress. Our study provides a uniform comparison sample for studying ULIRGs at higher redshifts such as Spitzer mid-IR selected ULIRGs at z=1~2 and submm galaxies.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.