Paper detail

Color and Stellar Population Gradients in Passively Evolving Galaxies at z~2 from HST/WFC3 Deep Imaging in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field

We report the detection of color gradients in six massive (stellar mass > 10^{10} M_{sun}) and passively evolving (specific SFR < 10^{-11}/yr) galaxies at redshift 1.3<z<2.5 identified in the HUDF using HST ACS and WFC3/IR images. After matching different PSFs, we obtain color maps and multi-band optical/near-IR photometry (BVizYJH) in concentric annuli, from the smallest resolved radial (~1.7 kpc) up to several times the H-band effective radius. We find that the inner regions of these galaxies have redder rest-frame UV--optical colors than the outer parts. The slopes of the color gradients mildly depend on the overall dust obscuration and rest-frame (U-V) color, with more obscured or redder galaxies having steeper color gradients. The z~2 color gradients are also steeper than those of local early-types. The gradient of a single parameter (age, extinction or metallicity) cannot fully explain the observed color gradients. Fitting spatially resolved HST seven-band photometry to stellar population synthesis models, we find that, regardless of assumptions for metallicity gradient, the redder inner regions of the galaxies have slightly higher dust obscuration than the bluer outer regions, although the magnitude depends on the assumed extinction law. The derived age gradient depends on the assumptions for metallicity gradient. We discuss the implications of a number of assumptions for metallicity gradient on the formation and evolution of these galaxies. We find that the evolution of the mass--size relationship from z~2 to z~0 cannot be driven by in--situ extended star formation, implying that accretion or merger is mostly responsible for the evolution. The lack of a correlation between color gradient and stellar mass argues against the metallicity gradient predicted by the monolithic collapse, which would require significant major mergers to evolve into the one observed at z~0. (Abridged)

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access13 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.