Paper detail

Collusion-Resilient Probabilistic Fingerprinting Scheme for Correlated Data

In order to receive personalized services, individuals share their personal data with a wide range of service providers, hoping that their data will remain confidential. Thus, in case of an unauthorized distribution of their personal data by these service providers (or in case of a data breach) data owners want to identify the source of such data leakage. Digital fingerprinting schemes have been developed to embed a hidden and unique fingerprint into shared digital content, especially multimedia, to provide such liability guarantees. However, existing techniques utilize the high redundancy in the content, which is typically not included in personal data. In this work, we propose a probabilistic fingerprinting scheme that efficiently generates the fingerprint by considering a fingerprinting probability (to keep the data utility high) and publicly known inherent correlations between data points. To improve the robustness of the proposed scheme against colluding malicious service providers, we also utilize the Boneh-Shaw fingerprinting codes as a part of the proposed scheme. Furthermore, observing similarities between privacy-preserving data sharing techniques (that add controlled noise to the shared data) and the proposed fingerprinting scheme, we make a first attempt to develop a data sharing scheme that provides both privacy and fingerprint robustness at the same time. We experimentally show that fingerprint robustness and privacy have conflicting objectives and we propose a hybrid approach to control such a trade-off with a design parameter. Using the proposed hybrid approach, we show that individuals can improve their level of privacy by slightly compromising from the fingerprint robustness. We implement and evaluate the performance of the proposed scheme on real genomic data. Our experimental results show the efficiency and robustness of the proposed scheme.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.