Paper detail

COLLISIONAL VERSUS COLLISIONLESS MATTER: A ONE-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS OF GRAVITATIONAL CLUSTERING

We present the results of a series of one-dimensional N-body and hydrodynamical simulations which have been used for testing the different clustering properties of baryonic and dark matter in an expanding background. Initial Gaussian random density perturbations with a power-law spectrum $P(k) \propto k^n$ are assumed. We analyse the distribution of density fluctuations and thermodynamical quantities for different spectral indices $n$ and discuss the statistical properties of clustering in the corresponding simulations. At large scales the final distribution of the two components is very similar while at small scales the dark matter presents a lumpiness which is not found in the baryonic matter. The amplitude of density fluctuations in each component depends on the spectral index $n$ and only for $n=-1$ the amplitude of baryonic density fluctuations is larger than that in the dark component. This result is also confirmed by the behaviour of the bias factor, defined as the ratio between the r.m.s of baryonic and dark matter fluctuations at different scales: while for $n=1,\ 3$ it is always less than unity except at very large scales where it tends to one, for $n=-1$ it is above 1.4 at all scales. All simulations show also that there is not an exact correspondence between the positions of largest peaks in dark and baryonic components, as confirmed by a cross-correlation analysis. The final temperatures depend on the initial spectral index: the highest values are obtained for $n=-1$ and are in proximity of high density regions.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.