Paper detail

Collisional Thermalization of Hydrogen and Helium in Solar Wind Plasma

In situ observations of the solar wind frequently show the temperature of $α$-particles (fully ionized helium), $T_α$, to significantly differ from that of protons (ionized hydrogen), $T_p$. Many heating processes in the plasma act preferentially on $α$-particles, even as collisions among ions act to gradually establish thermal equilibrium. Measurements from the $\textit{Wind}$ spacecraft's Faraday cups reveal that, at $r=1.0\ \textrm{AU}$ from the Sun, the observed values of the $α$-proton temperature ratio, $θ_{αp} \equiv T_α\,/\,T_p$ has a complex, bimodal distribution. This study applied a simple model for the radial evolution of $θ_{αp}$ to these data to compute expected values of $θ_{αp}$ at $r=0.1\ \textrm{AU}$. These inferred $θ_{αp}$-values have no trace of the bimodality seen in the $θ_{αp}$-values measured at $r=1.0\ \textrm{AU}$ but are instead consistent with the actions of the known mechanisms for $α$-particle preferential heating. This result underscores the importance of collisional processes in the dynamics of the solar wind and suggests that similar mechanisms may lead to preferential $α$-particle heating in both slow and fast wind.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.