Paper detail

Collisional Evolution of Galaxy Clusters and the Growth of Common Halos

We investigated the dynamical evolution of clusters of galaxies in virial equilibrium using Fokker-Planck models and self-consistent N-body models. In particular, we focused on the growth of a common halo, which is a cluster-wide halo formed by matter stripped from galaxies, and the development of a central density cusp. The Fokker-Planck models include the effects of two-body gravitational encounters both between galaxies and between galaxies and common halo particles. The effects of tidal mass stripping from the galaxies due to close galaxy-galaxy encounters and accompanying dissipation of the orbital kinetic energies of the galaxies were also taken into account in the Fokker-Planck models. We find that the results of the Fokker-Planck models are in excellent agreement with those of the N-body models regarding the growth of the common halo mass and the evolution of the cluster density profiles. In the central region of the cluster, a shallow density cusp, approximated by $ρ(r) \propto r^{-α}$ ($α\sim$ 1), develops. This shallow cusp results from the combined effects of two-body relaxation and tidal stripping. The cusp steepness, $α$, weakly depends on the relative importance of the tidal stripping. When the effect of stripping is important, the central velocity dispersion decreases as the central density increases and, consequently, a shallow ($α<2$) cusp is formed. In the limit of no stripping, usual gravothermal core collapse occurs, i.e. the central velocity dispersion increases as the central density increases with a steep ($α>2$) cusp left. We conclude from our consideration of the origin of the cusp demonstrated here that shallow cusps should develop in real galaxy clusters.

preprint2002arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.