Paper detail

Collisional Consequences of Big Interstellar Grains

Identification by the Ulysses spacecraft of interstellar grains inside the planetary system provides a new window for the study of diffuse interstellar matter. Dust particles observed by Ulysses and confirmed by Galileo are more massive ($\geq 10^{-13} {\rm g}$) than the 'classical' interstellar grains. Even bigger grains ($\approx 10^{-7} {\rm g}$) were observed in form of interstellar meteors. We analyze the consequences of the plentiful existence of massive grains in the diffuse interstellar medium. Astronomically observed 'classical' interstellar grains can be described by a size distribution ranging from about 5 to 250 nm in radius (about $10^{-18}$ to $10^{-13} {\rm g}$). Lifetimes of these particles, due to mutual collisions in interstellar space, can be as short as $10^{5} f$ years, where f = 10 to 1000, is the fraction of total lifetime to the time when grains are exposed to supernova shocks. Shattering is a source of the smallest of these grains, but grains more massive than about $10^{-16} {\rm g}$ of the classical interstellar grain population are rapidly destroyed. When applying the same shattering mechanism to the more massive grains found recently, we suggest that collisions of particles bigger than about $10^{-15} {\rm g}$ provide a source for smaller grains. Because massive grains couple to the interstellar gas only over large (100 to 1000 pc) length scales, the cosmic abundance ratio of gas-to-dust needs only to be preserved averaged over corresponding volumes of space.

preprint1999arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.