Paper detail

Collision of nanoparticles of covalently bound atoms. Impact of stress-dependent adhesion

The impact of nanoparticles (NPs) comprised of atoms with covalent bonding is investigated numerically and theoretically. We use recent models of covalent bonding of carbon atoms and elaborate a numerical model of amorphous carbon (a-C) NPs, which may be applied for modelling soot particles. We compute the elastic moduli of the a-C material which agree well with the available data. We reveal an interesting novel phenomenon - stress dependent adhesion, which refers to stress-enhanced formation of covalent bonds between contacting surfaces. We observe that the effective adhesion coefficient linearly depends on the maximal stress between the surfaces and explain this dependence. We compute the normal restitution coefficient for colliding NPs and explore the dependence of the critical velocity, demarcating bouncing and aggregative collisions, on the NP radius. Using the obtained elastic and stress-dependent adhesive coefficients we develop a theory for the critical velocity. The predictions of the theory agree very well with the simulation results.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.