Paper detail

Collision centrality and energy dependence of strange hadron production in Au + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}}= 7.7-54.4 GeV

We apply an equal-velocity quark combination model to systematically study the transverse momentum (p_{T}) spectra of strange hadrons K_{S}^{0}, ϕ, Λ, Ξ^{-}, Ω^{-}, \barΛ, \barΞ^{+} and \barΩ^{+} at mid-rapidity in Au+Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}}= 7.7, 11.5, 19.6, 27, 39, 54.4 GeV. Relative deviation between the model calculation and experimental data of these eight hadrons is generally about 2-3% at \sqrt{s_{NN}}= 27, 39, 54.4 GeV and in central collisions at 7.7, 11.5, 19.6 GeV. The deviation slightly increases up to about 4% in the semi-central and peripheral collision at \sqrt{s_{NN}}= 7.7, 11.5, 19.6 GeV. We systematically explain the dependence of two baryon-to-meson ratios \barΛ/K_{S}^{0} and Ω/ϕon p_{T}, collision centrality and collision energy by the property of quark p_{T} spectra at hadronization. We derive the analytic relations between R_{CP} of hadrons and those of quarks, and we use them to naturally explain the species and p_{T} dependence of R_{CP} of those strange hadrons.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.