Paper detail

Colliding Decimetre Dust

Collisional evolution is a key process in planetesimal formation and decimetre bodies play a key role in the different models. However, the outcome of collisions between two dusty decimetre bodies has never been studied experimentally. Therefore, we carried out microgravity collision experiments in the Bremen drop tower. The agglomerates consist of quartz with irregularly shaped micrometre-sized grains and the mean volume filling factor is 0.437 $\pm$ 0.004. The aggregates are cylindrical with 12 cm in height and 12 cm in diameter and typcial masses are 1.5 kg. These are the largest and most massive dust aggregates studied in collisions to date. We observed rebound and fragmentation but no sticking in the velocity range between 0.8 and 25.7 cm s$^{-1}$. The critical fragmentation velocity for split up of an aggregate is 16.2 $\pm$ 0.4 cm s$^{-1}$. At lower velocities the aggregates bounce of each other. In this velocity range the coefficient of restitution decreases with increasing collision velocity from 0.8 to 0.3. While the aggregates are very weak the critical specific kinetic energy for fragmentation $Q_{μ=1}$ is a factor 6 larger than expected. Collisions of large bodies in protoplanetary discs are supposed to be much faster and the generation of smaller fragments is likely. In planetary rings collision velocities are of the order of a few cm s$^{-1}$ and are thereby in the same range investigated in these experiments. The coefficient of restitution of dust agglomerates and regolith covered ice particles, which are common in planetary rings, are similar.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.