Paper detail

Collider Signatures of Neutrino Masses and Mixing from R-parity Violation

R-parity violation in the supersymmetric standard model can be the source of neutrino masses and mixing. We analyze the neutrino mass matrix coming from either bilinear or trilinear R-parity violation and its collider signatures, assuming that the atmospheric and solar neutrino data are explained by three active neutrino oscillations. Taking the gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking mechanism, we show that the lightest neutralino decays well inside the detector and the model could be tested by observing its branching ratios in the future colliders. In the bilinear model where only the small solar neutrino mixing angle can be accommodated, the relation, $10^3$ BR($νe^\pm τ^\mp$) $\sim$ BR($νμ^\pm τ^\mp$) $\approx$ BR($ντ^\pm τ^\mp$), serves as a robust test of the model. The large mixing angle solution can be realized in the trilinear model which predicts BR($νe^\pm τ^\mp$) $\sim$ BR($νμ^\pm τ^\mp$) $\sim$ BR($ντ^\pm τ^\mp$). In either case, the relation, BR($e jj$) $\ll$ BR($μjj$) $\sim$ BR($τjj$), should hold to be consistent with the atmospheric neutrino and CHOOZ experiments.

preprint2002arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.