Paper detail

Collective excitations in two-band superconductors

We investigate the eigen oscillations of internal degrees of freedom (Higgs mode and Goldstone mode) of two-band superconductors using the extended time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory, formulated in a work Grigorishin (2021) \cite{grig2}, for the case of two coupled order parameters by both the internal proximity effect and the drag effect. It is demonstrated, that the Goldstone mode splits into two branches: common mode oscillations with the acoustic spectrum, which is absorbed by the gauge field, and anti-phase oscillations with the energy gap (mass) in the spectrum determined by the interband coupling, which can be associated with the Leggett mode. The Higgs mode splits into two branches also: a massive one, whose energy gap vanishes at the critical temperature $T_{c}$, another massive one, whose energy gap does not vanish at $T_{c}$. It is demonstrated, that the second branch of the Higgs mode is nonphysical, and it, together with the Leggett mode, can be removed by the special choice of coefficient at the "drag" term in the Lagrangian. In the same time, such a choice leaves only one coherence length, thereby prohibiting so-called type-1.5 superconductors. We analyze experimental data about the Josephson effect between two-band superconductors. In particular, it is demonstrated, that the resonant enhancement of the DC current through a Josephson junction at a resonant bias voltage $V_{\mathrm{res}}$, when the Josephson frequency matches the frequency of some internal oscillation mode in two-band superconductors (banks), can be explained with the coupling between AC Josephson current and Higgs oscillations. Thus, explanation of this effect does not need the Leggett mode.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.