Paper detail

Collapsing Threads Safely with Soft Invariants

Canonical abstraction is a static analysis technique that represents states as 3-valued logical structures, and produces finite abstract systems. Despite providing a finite bound, these abstractions may still suffer from the state explosion problem. Notably, for concurrent programs with arbitrary interleaving, if threads in a state are abstracted based on their location, then the number of locations will be a combinatorial factor in the size of the statespace. We present an approach using canonical abstraction that avoids this state explosion by "collapsing" all of the threads in a state into a single abstract representative. Properties of threads that would be lost by the abstraction, but are needed for verification, are retained by defining conditional "soft invariant" instrumentation predicates. This technique is used to adapt previous models for verifying linearizability of nonblocking concurrent data structure algorithms, resulting in exponentially smaller statespaces.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.