Paper detail

Collapsing regions and black hole formation

Up to a conjecture in Riemannian geometry, we significantly strengthen a recent theorem of Eardley by proving that a compact region in an initial data surface that is collapsing sufficiently fast in comparison to its surface-to-volume ratio must contain a future trapped region. In addition to establishing this stronger result, the geometrical argument used does not require any asymptotic or energy conditions on the initial data. It follows that if such a region can be found in an asymptotically flat Cauchy surface of a spacetime satisfying the null-convergence condition, the spacetime must contain a black hole with the future trapped region therein. Further, up to another conjecture, we prove a strengthened version of our theorem by arguing that if a certain function (defined on the collection of compact subsets of the initial data surface that are themselves three-dimensional manifolds with boundary) is not strictly positive, then the initial data surface must contain a future trapped region. As a byproduct of this work, we offer a slightly generalized notion of a future trapped region as well as a new proof that future trapped regions lie within the black hole region.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.