Paper detail

Collapse in Self-gravitating Turbulent Fluids

Motivated by the nonlinear star formation efficiency found in recent numerical simulations by a number of workers, we perform high-resolution adaptive mesh refinement simulations of star formation in self-gravitating turbulently driven gas. As we follow the collapse of this gas, we find that the character of the flow changes at two radii, the disk radius $r_d$, and the radius $r_*$ where the enclosed gas mass exceeds the stellar mass. Accretion starts at large scales and works inwards. In line with recent analytical work, we find that the density evolves to a fixed attractor, $ρ(r,t ) \rightarrow ρ(r)$, for $r_d<r<r_*$; mass flows through this structure onto a sporadically gravitationally unstable disk, and from thence onto the star. In the bulk of the simulation box we find that the random motions $v_T \sim r^p$ with $p \sim 0.5$, in agreement with Larson's size-linewidth relation. In the vicinity of massive star forming regions we find $ p \sim 0.2-0.3$, as seen in observations. For $r<r_*$, $v_T$ increases inward, with $p=-1/2$. Finally, we find that the total stellar mass $M_*(t)\sim t^2$ in line with previous numerical and analytic work that suggests a nonlinear rate of star formation.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.