Paper detail

Cold Nuclear Matter Effects on jpsi Production with Extrinsic pT at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.5\mathrm{~TeV}$ at the LHC

Taking into account the gluon shadowing and the $J/ψ$ nuclear absorption, we evaluate the Cold Nuclear Matter (CNM) effects on $J/ψ$ production in $p$Pb and PbPb collisions at the design LHC energy for PbPb collisions, $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.5$ TeV. In view of the good agreement between the yield prediction using the LO CSM and the ALICE data at 7 TeV, we employ the latter model to use a complete description of the kinematics of the underlying $2 \rightarrow 2$ partonic process, namely $g + g \rightarrow J/ψ+ g$. We observe a large $J/ψ$ suppression in $p$Pb and PbPb collisions due to the strong shadowing of the gluon distribution in the lead ion at the corresponding gluon momentum fractions. This suppression from CNM effects has a strong rapidity dependence which may compensate, partially or completely, that of of the predicted charm recombination in PbPb collisions.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.