Paper detail

Cold freeze out of superheavy dark matter and Hubble tension

We propose a unified dark matter framework, the "X miracle", in which dark matter consists of superheavy, nonthermal X particles whose relic abundance is set by annihilation or decay inside the earliest self-gravitating bound objects, rather than by conventional weak-scale freeze-out of semi-relativistic WIMPs. X particles are produced nonthermally with an initial overabundance $ρ_{ini}\ggρ_{\infty}$, become nonrelativistic extremely early, and redshift to ultra-cold velocities. This permits collapse into compact bound states characterized by a quantum-gravitational radius $r_X=4\hbar^2/Gm_X^3=10^{-13}$m, much larger than the Compton wavelength. The framework favors a mass $m_X=10^{12}$GeV and an enhanced effective cross section $10^{-21}$m$^3$/s. Overlapping wavefunctions in these compact states drive efficient annihilation or decay, producing a "cold" freeze-out that converts most $ρ_{ini}$ into radiation and leaves a small relic density $ρ_{\infty}$. Solving Boltzmann equations shows that a level of depletion of one surviving particle per $10^9$ can generate $ΔN_{eff}\approx$0.4, potentially easing Hubble tension. For $m_X=10^{12}$GeV we obtain a dark coupling $α_X=0.09$, compatible with UHECR limits. Early collapse at $t\sim 10^{-6}$s can release binding energy in high-frequency (~100 kHz) gravitational waves or in ultralight GUT-scale axions with mass ~$10^{-9}$eV. Superheavy sterile neutrinos offer a natural particle realization, linking dark matter to neutrino mass generation and baryogenesis; gravitational production of X then points to high-scale inflation with efficient reheating. The X-miracle scenario demonstrates that dark matter need not be weak-scale: its abundance and observable signatures can instead be governed by small-scale gravitational dynamics, with correlated predictions for UHECRs, axions, gravitational waves, and small-scale structures.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.