Paper detail

Cohomology of the space of polynomial maps on $\mathbb{A}^1$ with prescribed ramification

In this paper we study the moduli spaces $Simp^m_n$ of degree $n+1$ morphisms $ \mathbb{A}^1_{K} \to \mathbb{A}^1_{K}$ with "ramification length $<m$" over an algebraically closed field $K$. For each $m$, the moduli space $Simp^m_n$ is a Zariski open subset of the space of degree $n+1$ polynomials over $K$ up to $Aut (\mathbb{A}^1_{K})$. It is, in a way, orthogonal to the many papers about polynomials with prescribed zeroes -- here we are prescribing, instead, the ramification data. Exploiting the topological properties of the poset that encodes the ramification behaviour, we use a sheaf-theoretic argument to compute $H^*(Simp^m_n(\mathbb{C}); \mathbb{Q})$ as well as the étale cohomology $H^*_{et}({Simp^m_n}_{/K}; \mathbb{Q}_{\ell})$ for $char K=0$ or $char K> n+1$. As a by-product we obtain that $H^*(Simp^m_n(\mathbb{C}); \mathbb{Q})$ is independent of $n$, thus implying rational cohomological stability. When $char K>0$ our methods compute $H^*_{et}(Simp^m_n; \mathbb{Q}_{\ell})$ provided $char K>n+1$ and show that the étale cohomology groups in positive characteristics do not stabilize.

preprint2018arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.