Paper detail

Cohomology of SL(3,Z) with coefficients in the standard representation

This paper is a natural continuation of a joint paper with Bajpai, Harder and Moya Giusti \cite{BHHM}, even though it began as an answer to Goncharov's question. It that paper, we had complete description for all representations except for odd symmetric powers and their dual ones. For those representations we were left with two options: certain one dimensional module is a ghost space or not. Here we find the $H^2(SL_3(\Z),V_3)$ has ghost classes. It means that it is generated by a class from the cohomology of the Borel subgroup. With the techniques developed here, we show that the $d_2$ map of the spectral sequence for the boundary cohomology of $GL_4(\Z)$ is non-trivial if and only if there is a ghost class in $GL_3(\Z)$ (see Propositions 11 and 12.) We use a result of Elbaz-Vincent, Gangl and Soule to show that a spectral sequence related to $GL_4(\Z)$ does not degenerate at $E_2$-level. Then $d_2$ is non-trivial. Therefore, we obtain that $H^2(SL_3(\Z),V_3))$ is a ghost space, where $V_3$ is the standard representation.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.