Paper detail

Cohomology algebra of plane curves, weak combinatorial type, and formality

We determine an explicit presentation by generators and relations of the cohomology algebra $H^*(\mathbb P^2\setminus C,\mathbb C)$ of the complement to an algebraic curve $C$ in the complex projective plane $\mathbb P^2$, via the study of log-resolution logarithmic forms on $\mathbb P^2$. As a first consequence, we derive that $H^*(\mathbb P^2\setminus C,\mathbb C)$ depends only on the following finite pieces of data: the number of irreducible components of $C$ together with their degrees and genera, the number of local branches of each component at each singular point, and the intersection numbers of every two distinct local branches at each singular point of $C$. This finite set of data is referred to as the weak combinatorial type of $C$. A further corollary is that the twisted cohomology jumping loci of $H^*(\mathbb P^2\setminus C,\mathbb C)$ containing the trivial character also depend on the weak combinatorial type of $C$. Finally, the explicit construction of the generators and relations allows us to prove that complements of plane projective curves are formal spaces in the sense of Sullivan.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.