Paper detail

Coherence effect in a two-band superconductor: Application to iron pnictides

From a theoretical point of view, we propose an experimental method to determine the pairing symmetry of iron pnictides. We focus on two kinds of pairing symmetries, $s_{+-}$ and $s_{++}$, which are strong candidates for the pairing symmetry of iron pnictides. For each of these two symmetries, we calculate both the density and spin response functions by using the two-band BCS model within the one-loop approximation. As a result, a clear difference is found between the $s_{+-}$- and $s_{++}$-wave states in the temperature dependence of the response functions at nesting vector $\bf{Q}$, which connects the hole and electron Fermi surfaces. We point out that this difference comes from the coherence effect in the two-band superconductor. We suggest that the pairing symmetry could be clarified by observing the temperature dependence of both the density and spin structure factors at the nesting vector $\bf{Q}$ in neutron scattering measurements.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.