Paper detail

Coevolution of dust, gas, and stars in galaxies - I. Spatial distributions and scaling-relations of dust and molecular hydrogen

We investigate the time evolution of dust properties, molecular hydrogen (H_2) contents, and star formation histories in galaxies by using our original chemodynamical simulations. The simulations include the formation of dust in the stellar winds of supernovae (SNe) and asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars, the growth and destruction processes of dust in the interstellar medium (ISM), the formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) dust in carbon-rich AGB stars, the H_2 formation on dust grains, and the H_2 photo-dissociation due to far ultra-violet (FUV) light in a self-consistent manner. We focus mainly on disk galaxies with different total masses in this preliminary study. The principle results are as follows: The star formation histories of disk galaxies can be regulated by the time evolution of interstellar dust, mainly because the formation rates of H_2 can be controlled by dust properties. The observed correlation between dust-to-gas-ratios (D) and gas-phase oxygen abundances (A_O = 12+log(O/H)) can be reproduced reasonably well in the present models. The disks show negative radial gradients (i.e., larger in inner regions) of H_2 fraction (f_H2), PAH-to-dust mass ratio (f_PAH), D, and A_O and these gradients evolve with time. The surface-mass densities of dust (Sigma_dust) are correlated more strongly with the total surface gas densities than with those of H_2. Local gaseous regions with higher D are more likely to have higher f_H2 in individual disks and total H_2 masses correlate well with total dust masses. More massive disk galaxies are more likely to have higher D, f_PAH, and f_H2 and smaller dust-to-stellar mass ratios. We also compare between galactic star formation histories in the metallicity-dependent and dust-dependent star formation models and find no major differences.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.