Paper detail

Codes with Unequal Locality

For a code $\code$, its $i$-th symbol is said to have locality $r$ if its value can be recovered by accessing some other $r$ symbols of $\code$. Locally repairable codes (LRCs) are the family of codes such that every symbol has locality $r$. In this paper, we focus on (linear) codes whose individual symbols can be partitioned into disjoint subsets such that the symbols in one subset have different locality than the symbols in other. We call such codes as "codes with unequal locality". For codes with "unequal information locality", we compute a tight upper bound on the minimum distance as a function of number of information symbols of each locality. We demonstrate that the construction of Pyramid codes can be adapted to design codes with unequal information locality that achieve the minimum distance bound. This result generalizes the classical result of Gopalan et al. for codes with unequal locality. Next, we consider codes with "unequal all symbol locality", and establish an upper bound on the minimum distance as a function of number of symbols of each locality. We show that the construction based on rank-metric codes by Silberstein et al. can be adapted to obtain codes with unequal all symbol locality that achieve the minimum distance bound. Finally, we introduce the concept of "locality requirement" on a code, which can be viewed as a recoverability requirement on symbols. Information locality requirement on a code essentially specifies the minimum number of information symbols of different localities that must be present in the code. We present a greedy algorithm that assigns localities to information symbols so as to maximize the minimum distance among all codes that satisfy a given locality requirement.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.