Paper detail

Coded Shotgun Sequencing

Most DNA sequencing technologies are based on the shotgun paradigm: many short reads are obtained from random unknown locations in the DNA sequence. A fundamental question, studied in arXiv:1203.6233, is what read length and coverage depth (i.e., the total number of reads) are needed to guarantee reliable sequence reconstruction. Motivated by DNA-based storage, we study the coded version of this problem;i.e., the scenario where the DNA molecule being sequenced is a codeword from a predefined codebook. Our main result is an exact characterization of the capacity of the resulting shotgun sequencing channel as a function of the read length and coverage depth. In particular, our results imply that, while in the uncoded case, $O(n)$ reads of length greater than $2\log{n}$ are needed for reliable reconstruction of a length-$n$ binary sequence, in the coded case, only $O(n/\log{n})$ reads of length greater than $\log{n}$ are needed for the capacity to be arbitrarily close to $1$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.