Paper detail

Coded Retransmission in Wireless Networks Via Abstract MDPs: Theory and Algorithms

Consider a transmission scheme with a single transmitter and multiple receivers over a faulty broadcast channel. For each receiver, the transmitter has a unique infinite stream of packets, and its goal is to deliver them at the highest throughput possible. While such multiple-unicast models are unsolved in general, several network coding based schemes were suggested. In such schemes, the transmitter can either send an uncoded packet, or a coded packet which is a function of a few packets. The packets sent can be received by the designated receiver (with some probability) or heard and stored by other receivers. Two functional modes are considered; the first presumes that the storage time is unlimited, while in the second it is limited by a given Time to Expire (TTE) parameter. We model the transmission process as an infinite-horizon Markov Decision Process (MDP). Since the large state space renders exact solutions computationally impractical, we introduce policy restricted and induced MDPs with significantly reduced state space, and prove that with proper reward function they have equal optimal value function (hence equal optimal throughput). We then derive a reinforcement learning algorithm, which learns the optimal policy for the induced MDP. This optimal strategy of the induced MDP, once applied to the policy restricted one, significantly improves over uncoded schemes. Next, we enhance the algorithm by means of analysis of the structural properties of the resulting reward functional. We demonstrate that our method scales well in the number of users, and automatically adapts to the packet loss rates, unknown in advance. In addition, the performance is compared to the recent bound by Wang, which assumes much stronger coding (e.g., intra-session and buffering of coded packets), yet is shown to be comparable.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.