Paper detail

Codebook Mismatch Can Be Fully Compensated by Mismatched Decoding

We consider an ensemble of constant composition codes that are subsets of linear codes: while the encoder uses only the constant-composition subcode, the decoder operates as if the full linear code was used, with the motivation of simultaneously benefiting both from the probabilistic shaping of the channel input and from the linear structure of the code. We prove that the codebook mismatch can be fully compensated by using a mismatched additive decoding metric that achieves the random coding error exponent of (non-linear) constant composition codes. As the coding rate tends to the mutual information, the optimal mismatched metric approaches the maximum a posteriori probability (MAP) metric, showing that codebook mismatch with mismatched MAP metric is capacity-achieving for the optimal input assignment.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.