Paper detail

Coarse-grained decomposition and fine-grained interaction for multi-hop question answering

Recent advances regarding question answering and reading comprehension have resulted in models that surpass human performance when the answer is contained in a single, continuous passage of text, requiring only single-hop reasoning. However, in actual scenarios, lots of complex queries require multi-hop reasoning. The key to the Question Answering task is semantic feature interaction between documents and questions, which is widely processed by Bi-directional Attention Flow (Bi-DAF), but Bi-DAF generally captures only the surface semantics of words in complex questions and fails to capture implied semantic feature of intermediate answers. As a result, Bi-DAF partially ignores part of the contexts related to the question and cannot extract the most important parts of multiple documents. In this paper we propose a new model architecture for multi-hop question answering, by applying two completion strategies: (1) Coarse-Grain complex question Decomposition (CGDe) strategy are introduced to decompose complex question into simple ones under the condition of without any additional annotations (2) Fine-Grained Interaction (FGIn) strategy are introduced to better represent each word in the document and extract more comprehensive and accurate sentences related to the inference path. The above two strategies are combined and tested on the SQuAD and HotpotQA datasets, and the experimental results show that our method outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.