Paper detail

CO-to-H$_2$ Conversion and Spectral Column Density in Molecular Clouds: The Vriability of $X_{\rm CO}$ Factor

Analyzing the Galactic plane CO survey with the Nobeyama 45-m telescope, we compared the spectral column density (SCD) of H$_2$ calculated for $^{12}$CO line using the current conversion factor $X_{\rm CO}$ to that for $^{13}$CO line under LTE in M16 and W43 regions. Here, SCD is defined by $dN_{\rm H_2}/dv$ with $N_{\rm H_2}$ and $v$ being the column density and radial velocity, respectively. It is found that the $X_{\rm CO}$ method significantly under-estimates the H$_2$ density in a cloud or region, where SCD exceeds a critical value ($ \sim 3\times 10^{21}\ [{\rm H_2 \ cm^{-2} \ (km \ s^{-1})^{-1}}]$), but over-estimates in lower SCD regions. We point out that the actual CO-to-H$_2$ conversion factor varies with the H$_2$ column density or with the CO-line intensity: It increases in the inner and opaque parts of molecular clouds, whereas it decreases in the low-density envelopes. However, in so far as the current $X_{\rm CO}$ is used combined with the integrated $^{12}$CO intensity averaged over an entire cloud, it yields a consistent value with that calculated using the $^{13}$CO intensity by LTE. Based on the analysis, we propose a new CO-to-\Htwo conversion relation, $N_{\rm H_2}^* = \int X_{\rm CO}^*(T_{\rm B}) T_{\rm B} dv$, where $X_{\rm CO}^*=(T_{\rm B}/T_{\rm B}^*)^βX_{\rm CO}$ is the modified spectral conversion factor as a function of the brightness temperature, $T_{\rm B}$, of the ${12}$CO ($J=1-0$) line, and $β\sim 1-2$ and $T_{\rm B}^*=12-16$ K are empirical constants obtained by fitting to the observed data. The formula corrects for the over/under estimation of the column density at low/high-CO line intensities, and is applicable to molecular clouds with $T_{\rm B} \ge 1$ K (rms noise in the data) from envelope to cores at sub-parsec scales (resolution). (Full resolution copy available at http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~sofue/news/2020_mn_Xco12co13_fugin.pdf)

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.