Paper detail

CO Observations of a FeLoBAL Quasar with an H alpha Absorption Line at z=2.3

SDSS J083942.11+380526.3 is an Iron Low-ionization Broad Absorption Line (FeLoBAL) quasar at z = 2.3, and Aoki et al. (2006) recently found the presence of an H alpha absorption line in the broad H alpha emission line. Motivated by an idea that this quasar may be a huge molecular gas reservoir in the early phase of quasar evolution, we made CO(J=3-2) observations of it using the Nobeyama Millimeter Array. No significant CO emission was detected; although an emission-like feature (2.5 sigma) was seen close (~ 2") to the quasar, we regard it as a noise. The obtained 3 sigma upper limit on the CO luminosity is L'_{{\rm CO}(J=3-2)} = 4.5 \times 10^{10} K km/s pc^2, which corresponds to M({\rm H}_2) = 3.6 times 10^10 M_{\odot} if we adopt the CO-to-H_2 conversion factor of 0.8 M_{\odot} (K km/s pc^2)^{-1}. This upper limit is comparable to L'_{{\rm CO}(J=3-2)} (and thus the molecular gas mass) detected in quasars and BAL quasars at z=1-3, and no sign of the presence of the huge amount of molecular gas in this FeLoBAL quasar was obtained.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.