Paper detail

CO-Line and Radio Continuum Study of Elephant Trunks: The Pillars of Creation in M16

Molecular-line and radio continuum properties of the elephant trunks (ET, pillars of creation) in M16 are investigated by analyzing the 12CO(J=1-0), 13CO(J=1-0) and C18O(J=1-0)-line survey data with the Nobeyama 45-m telescope and the Galactic plane radio survey at 20 and 90 cm with the Very Large Array. The head clump of Pillar West I is found to be the brightest radio source in M16, showing thermal spectrum and property of a compact HII region with the nearest O5 star in NGC 6611 being the heating source. The radio pillars have cometary structure concave to the molecular trunk head, and the surface brightness distribution obeys a simple illumination law by a remote excitation source. The molecular density in the pillar head is estimated to be several $10^4$ H$_2$ cm$^{-3}$ and molecular mass $\sim 13-40 M\odot$. CO-line kinematics reveals random rotation of the clumps in the pillar tail at $\sim 1-2$ km/s, comparable to the velocity dispersion and estimated Alfven velocity. It is suggested that the random directions of velocity gradients would manifest a torsional magnetic oscillation of the clumps around the pillar axis.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.