Paper detail

CO Emission, Molecular Gas, and Metallicity in Main-Sequence Star-Forming Galaxies at $z\sim2.3$

We present observations of CO(3-2) in 13 main-sequence $z=2.0-2.5$ star-forming galaxies at $\log(M_*/M_{\odot})=10.2-10.6$ that span a wide range in metallicity (O/H) based on rest-optical spectroscopy. We find that CO(3-2)/SFR decreases with decreasing metallicity, implying that the CO luminosity per unit gas mass is lower in low-metallicity galaxies at $z\sim2$. We constrain the CO-to-H$_2$ conversion factor ($α_{\text{CO}}$) and find that $α_{\text{CO}}$ inversely correlates with metallicity at $z\sim2$. We derive molecular gas masses ($M_{\text{mol}}$) and characterize the relations among $M_*$, SFR, $M_{\text{mol}}$, and metallicity. At $z\sim2$, $M_{\text{mol}}$ increases and molecular gas fraction ($M_{\text{mol}}$/$M_*$) decrease with increasing $M_*$, with a significant secondary dependence on SFR. Galaxies at $z\sim2$ lie on a near-linear molecular KS law that is well-described by a constant depletion time of 700 Myr. We find that the scatter about the mean SFR-$M_*$, O/H-$M_*$, and $M_{\text{mol}}$-$M_*$ relations is correlated such that, at fixed $M_*$, $z\sim2$ galaxies with larger $M_{\text{mol}}$ have higher SFR and lower O/H. We thus confirm the existence of a fundamental metallicity relation at $z\sim2$ where O/H is inversely correlated with both SFR and $M_{\text{mol}}$ at fixed $M_*$. These results suggest that the scatter of the $z\sim2$ star-forming main sequence, mass-metallicity relation, and $M_{\text{mol}}$-$M_*$ relation are primarily driven by stochastic variations in gas inflow rates. We place constraints on the mass loading of galactic outflows and perform a metal budget analysis, finding that massive $z\sim2$ star-forming galaxies retain only 30% of metals produced, implying that a large mass of metals resides in the circumgalactic medium.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access12 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.