Paper detail

co-BPM: a Bayesian Model for Divergence Estimation

Divergence is not only an important mathematical concept in information theory, but also applied to machine learning problems such as low-dimensional embedding, manifold learning, clustering, classification, and anomaly detection. We proposed a bayesian model---co-BPM---to characterize the discrepancy of two sample sets, i.e., to estimate the divergence of their underlying distributions. In order to avoid the pitfalls of plug-in methods that estimate each density independently, our bayesian model attempts to learn a coupled binary partition of the sample space that best captures the landscapes of both distributions, then make direct inference on their divergences. The prior is constructed by leveraging the sequential buildup of the coupled binary partitions and the posterior is sampled via our specialized MCMC. Our model provides a unified way to estimate various types of divergences and enjoys convincing accuracy. We demonstrate its effectiveness through simulations, comparisons with the \emph{state-of-the-art} and a real data example.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.