Paper detail

CNN-based fully automatic wrist cartilage volume quantification in MR Image

Detection of cartilage loss is crucial for the diagnosis of osteo- and rheumatoid arthritis. A large number of automatic segmentation tools have been reported so far for cartilage assessment in magnetic resonance images of large joints. As compared to knee or hip, wrist cartilage has a more complex structure so that automatic tools developed for large joints are not expected to be operational for wrist cartilage segmentation. In that respect, a fully automatic wrist cartilage segmentation method would be of high clinical interest. We assessed the performance of four optimized variants of the U-Net architecture with truncation of its depth and addition of attention layers (U-Net_AL). The corresponding results were compared to those from a patch-based convolutional neural network (CNN) we previously designed. The segmentation quality was assessed on the basis of a comparative analysis with manual segmentation using several morphological (2D DSC, 3D DSC, precision) and a volumetric metrics. The four networks outperformed the patch-based CNN in terms of segmentation homogeneity and quality. The median 3D DSC value computed with the U-Net_AL (0.817) was significantly larger than the corresponding DSC values computed with the other networks. In addition, the U-Net_AL CNN provided the lowest mean volume error (17%) and the highest Pearson correlation coefficient (0.765) with respect to the ground truth. Of interest, the reproducibility computed from using U-Net_AL was larger than the reproducibility of the manual segmentation. U-net convolutional neural network with additional attention layers provides the best wrist cartilage segmentation performance. In order to be used in clinical conditions, the trained network can be fine-tuned on a dataset representing a group of specific patients. The error of cartilage volume measurement should be assessed independently using a non-MRI method.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.