Paper detail

Clustering properties and halo masses for central galaxies in the local Universe

We investigate the clustering and dark matter halo mass for a sample of $\sim$16,000 central galaxies selected from the SDSS/DR7 group catalog. We select subsamples of central galaxies on three two-dimensional planes, each formed by stellar mass ($M_{\star}$) and one of the other properties including optical color (g-r) , surface stellar mass density ($μ_{\star}$) and central stellar velocity dispersion ($σ_{\star}$). For each subsample we measure both the projected cross-correlation function ($w_{p}(r_{p})$) relative to a reference galaxy sample, and an average mass of the host dark matter halos ($M_{halo}$) . For comparison we have also estimated the $w_{p}(r_{p})$ for the full galaxy population and the subset of satellite galaxies. We find that, for central galaxies, both $w_{p}(r_{p})$ and $M_{halo}$ show strongest dependence on $M_{\star}$, and there is no clear dependence on other properties when stellar mass is fixed. This result provides strong support to the previously-adopted assumption that, for central galaxies, stellar mass is the galaxy property that is best indicative of the host dark halo mass. The full galaxy population and the subset of satellites show similar clustering properties in all cases. However, they are similar to the centrals only at high masses ($M_{\star} \geq 10^{11} M_{\odot}$). At low-mass ($M_{\star} \leq 10^{11} M_{\odot}$), the results are different: the $w_{p}(r_{p})$ increases with both $σ$ and g-r when $M_{\star}$ is fixed, and depends very weakly on $M_{\star}$ when $σ_{\star}$ or g-r is fixed. At fixed $M_{star}$, the $μ_{\star}$ shows weak correlations with clustering amplitude (and halo mass for central galaxies). Our results suggest that it is necessary to consider central and satellite galaxies separately when studying the link between galaxies and dark matter halos. (Abridged)

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.