Paper detail

Clustering pipeline for determining consensus sequences in targeted next-generation sequencing

Analyses of targeted genomic sequencing data from next-generation-sequencing (NGS) technologies typically involves mapping reads to a reference sequence or clustering reads. For a number of species a reference genome is not available so the analyses of targeted sequencing data, for example polymorphic structural variation caused by mobile elements is difficult; clustering methods are preferred for such data analysis. Clustering of reads requires a clustering threshold parameter, which is used to compare and group reads. However, determining the optimal clustering threshold for a read dataset is challenging because of different sequence composition, the number of sequences present, and also the amount of sequencing errors in the dataset. High values of the clustering threshold parameter can falsely inflate the number of recovered genomic regions, while low values of clustering threshold can merge reads from distinct regions into a single cluster. Thus, an algorithm that can empirically determine clustering threshold is needed. We propose a pipeline for clustering genomic sequences wherein the clustering threshold is empirically determined from the NGS data. The optimal threshold is decided based on two internal clustering measures which assess clusters for small intra-cluster diameters and large inter-cluster distances. We evaluate the pipeline on two simulated datasets derived from human genome sequence simulating different genomic regions and sequencing depth. The total number of clusters obtained from our pipeline is closer to the actual number of reference sequences when compared to single round of clustering. Also, the number of clusters whose consensus sequence matches a corresponding reference sequence is higher in our pipeline. We observe that the presence of repeat regions affects clustering accuracy.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.