Paper detail

Clustering, percolation and directionally convex ordering of point processes

Heuristics indicate that point processes exhibiting clustering of points have larger critical radius $r_c$ for the percolation of their continuum percolation models than spatially homogeneous point processes. It has already been shown, and we reaffirm it in this paper, that the $dcx$ ordering of point processes is suitable to compare their clustering tendencies. Hence, it was tempting to conjecture that $r_c$ is increasing in $dcx$ order. Some numerical evidences support this conjecture for a special class of point processes, called perturbed lattices, which are "toy models" for determinantal and permanental point processes. However, the conjecture is not true in full generality, since one can construct a Cox point process with degenerate critical radius $r_c=0$, that is $dcx$ larger than a given homogeneous Poisson point process. Nevertheless, we are able to compare some nonstandard critical radii related, respectively, to the finiteness of the expected number of void circuits around the origin and asymptotic of the expected number of long occupied paths from the origin in suitable discrete approximations of the continuum model. These new critical radii sandwich the "true" one. Surprisingly, the inequalities for them go in opposite directions, which gives uniform lower and upper bounds on $r_c$ for all processes $dcx$ smaller than some given process. In fact, the above results hold under weaker assumptions on the ordering of void probabilities or factorial moment measures only. Examples of point processes comparable to Poisson processes in this weaker sense include determinantal and permanental processes. More generally, we show that point processes $dcx$ smaller than homogeneous Poisson processes exhibit phase transitions in certain percolation models based on the level-sets of additive shot-noise fields, as e.g. $k$-percolation and SINR-percolation.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.