Paper detail

Clustering of i-dropout galaxies at z=6 in GOODS and the UDF

We measured the angular clustering at z~6 from a large sample of i-dropout galaxies (293 with z<27.5 from GOODS and 95 with z<29.0 from the UDF). Our largest and most complete subsample (having L>0.5L*) shows the presence of clustering at 94% significance. For this sample we derive a (co-moving) correlation length of r_0=4.5^{+2.1}_{-3.2} h_{72}^{-1} Mpc and bias b=4.1^{+1.5}_{-2.6}, using an accurate model for the redshift distribution. No clustering could be detected in the much deeper but significantly smaller UDF, yielding b<4.4 (1 sigma). We compare our findings to Lyman break galaxies at z=3-5 at a fixed luminosity. Our best estimate of the bias parameter implies that i-dropouts are hosted by dark matter halos having masses of ~10^11 M_sun, similar to that of V-dropouts at z~5. We evaluate a recent claim that at z>5 star formation might have occurred more efficiently compared to that at z=3-4. This may provide an explanation for the very mild evolution observed in the UV luminosity density between z=6 and z=3. Although our results are consistent with such a scenario, the errors are too large to find conclusive evidence for this.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.