Paper detail

Clustering of galaxies at faint magnitudes

Significant uncertainties exist in the measured amplitude of the angular two-point correlation function of galaxies at magnitudes $I\approx26$ and fainter. Published results from HST and ground-based galaxy catalogs seem to differ by as much as a factor of 3, and it is not clear whether the correlation amplitude as a function of magnitude increases or decreases in the faintest magnitude bins. In order to clarify the situation, we present new results from both ground-based and HST galaxy catalogs. The angular two-point correlation function as a function of limiting R and I magnitudes was computed from a galaxy catalog created from the Hubble Deep Field - South (HDF-S) WFPC2 image. The measured amplitudes of the correlation at an angular separation of 1 arcsec are consistent with those measured in the Northern counter part of the field. The flanking fields (FF fields) of the Hubble deep fields were used to extend the magnitude range for which we compute correlation amplitudes towards brighter magnitude bins. This allows easier comparison of the amplitudes to ground based data. The newly measured correlation amplitudes as a function of magnitude limit were compared to previously published measurements at larger separations. For this comparison, the correlation function was approximated by a power law with an index of 0.8. The scatter in the correlation amplitudes is too large to be explained by random errors. We argue that the most likely cause is the assumption that the shape of the correlation function does not depend on the magnitude limit.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.