Paper detail

Clustering of CODEX clusters

Aims. We analyze the autocorrelation function of a large contiguous sample of galaxy clusters, the Constrain Dark Energy with X-ray (CODEX) sample, in which we take particular care of cluster definition. These clusters were X-ray selected using the RASS survey and then identified as galaxy clusters using the code redMaPPer run on the photometry of the SDSS. We develop methods for precisely accounting for the sample selection effects on the clustering and demonstrate their robustness using numerical simulations. Methods. Using the clean CODEX sample, which was obtained by applying a redshift-dependent richness selection, we computed the two-point autocorrelation function of galaxy clusters in the $0.1<z<0.3$ and $0.3<z<0.5$ redshift bins. We compared the bias in the measured correlation function with values obtained in numerical simulations using a similar cluster mass range. Results. By fitting a power law, we measured a correlation length $r_0=18.7 \pm 1.1$ and slope $γ=1.98 \pm 0.14$ for the correlation function in the full redshift range. By fixing the other cosmological parameters to their WMAP9 values, we reproduced the observed shape of the correlation function under the following cosmological conditions: $Ω_{m_0}=0.22^{+0.04}_{-0.03}$ and $S_8=σ_8 (Ω_{m_0} /0.3)^{0.5}=0.85^{+0.10}_{-0.08}$ with estimated additional systematic errors of $σ_{Ω_{m_0}} = 0.02$ and $σ_{S_8} = 0.20$. We illustrate the complementarity of clustering constraints by combining them with CODEX cosmological constraints based on the X-ray luminosity function, deriving $Ω_{m_0} = 0.25 \pm 0.01$ and $σ_8 = 0.81^{+0.01}_{-0.02}$ with an estimated additional systematic error of $σ_{Ω_{m_0}} = 0.07$ and $σ_{σ_8} = 0.04$. The mass calibration and statistical quality of the mass tracers are the dominant source of uncertainty.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.