Paper detail

Cluster mass estimates from weak lensing

The reliability of cluster lens reconstruction techniques based on weak lensing is studied in terms of the accuracy of their reproduction of the total cluster mass as a function of distance from the cluster center. To do so, a variety of reconstruction algorithms is applied to synthetic lensing data created using a sample of 60 numerically modeled clusters, and the mass reconstruction is compared to the known deflector mass. The results can be summarized as follows: (1) Reconstruction algorithms which require integrations extending over the entire real plane yield unreliable results, because they give rise to boundary effects which are hard to control; mass overestimates are more likely and more substantial in this case than underestimates. (2) Reconstruction techniques which avoid these boundary effects yield reliable lower bounds to the cluster mass. The tightness of such bounds depends on the size of the field, which can be extended synthetically to improve the results considerably. For the sample of numerical cluster models, the best lower bounds, achieved by combining synthetic field extension with non-linear, finite-field reconstruction, decline from 100% to 80% of the true cluster mass going from the cluster center to an angular distance of 2.5'. The 80% error bars of the lower mass bounds are +/- 10% to 15%.

preprint1994arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.