Paper detail

Cluster luminosity function and n^th ranked magnitude as a distance indicator

We define here a standard candle to determine the distance of clusters of galaxies and to investigate their peculiar velocities by using the n^{th} rank galaxy (magnitude m$_n$). We address the question of the universality of the luminosity function for a sample of 28 rich clusters of galaxies ($cz \simeq 20000 km/s$) in order to model the influence on $m_n$ of cluster richness. This luminosity function is found to be universal and the fit of a Schechter profile gives $α= -1.50 \pm 0.11$ and $M_{bj}* = -19.91 \pm 0.21$ in the range [-21,-17]. The uncorrected distance indicator $m_n$ is more efficient for the first ranks n. With n=5, we have a dispersion of 0.61 magnitude for the (m$_n$,5log(cz)) relation. When we correct for the richness effect and subtract the background galaxies we reduce the uncertainty to 0.21 magnitude with n=15. Simulations show that a large part of this dispersion originates from the intrinsic scatter of the standard candle itself. These provide upper bounds on the amplitude $σ_v$ of cluster radial peculiar motions. At a confidence level of 90%, the dispersion is 0.13 magnitude and $σ_v$ is limited to 1200 km/s for our sample of clusters.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.