Paper detail

Cluster Disruption: From infant mortality to long term survival

How stellar clusters disrupt, and over what timescales, is intimately linked with how they form. Here, we review the theory and observations of cluster disruption, both the suggested initial rapid dissolution phase (infant mortality) and the longer timescale processes that affect clusters after they emerge from their progenitor GMCs. Over the past decade, the standard paradigm that has developed is that all/most stars are formed in clusters and that the vast majority of these groups are disrupted over short timescales (< 10 Myr). This is thought to be due to the removal of the left over gas from the star-formation process, known as infant mortality. However, recent results have suggested that the fraction of stars that form in clusters has been overestimated, with the majority being formed in unbound groups (i.e. associations) which expand and disrupt without the need of invoking gas removal. Dynamical measurements of young massive clusters in the Galaxy suggest that clusters reach a stable equilibrium at very young (<3 Myr) ages, suggesting that gas expulsion has little effect on the cluster. After the early dynamical phase, clusters appear to be long lived and stable objects. We use the recent WFC3 image of the cluster population in M83 to test empirical disruption laws and find that the lifetime of clusters strongly depends on their ambient environment. While the role of cluster mass is less well constrained (due to the added parameter of the form of the cluster mass function), we find evidence suggesting that higher mass clusters survive longer, and that the cluster mass function (at least in M83, outside the nuclear region) is truncated above ~10^5Msun.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.