Paper detail

Cluster categories, selfinjective algebras, and stable Calabi-Yau dimensions: types D and E

The preprints arXiv:math/0610728 and arXiv:math/0612451 are withdrawn due to a problem with Theorem 2.2 in arXiv:math/0610728. The theorem claims that for certain triangulated categories with finitely many indecomposable objects, the Calabi-Yau dimension can be computed combinatorially, by finding the smallest d for which the Serre functor and the d'th power of the suspension functor have the same action on the Auslander-Reiten quiver. This is false, and we are grateful to Alex Dugas for pointing out a counterexample; see Section 5 of his paper arXiv:math/0808.1311 for more details. Unfortunately, we are not presently able to come up with a corrected version of the theorem, and this means that we cannot compute the Calabi-Yau dimensions of concrete stable module categories. Since these dimensions are necessary for identifying the categories with higher cluster categories, we presently have no means to achieve such identifications.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.