Paper detail

Cluster Alignments in the Edinburgh/Milano Cluster Redshift Survey

We present here the results of a statistical search for cluster alignments using the Edinburgh/Milano cluster redshift survey. This survey is a unique cluster database which has been objectively constructed to help minimise the systematic biases associated with previous optical cluster catalogues. We find some evidence for cluster alignments out to spatial separations of $<10\mpc$, however, it is not statistically significant. On larger scales, we find no evidence, statistically significant or not, for cluster alignments. These results are in most disagreement with the recent observations of West and Plionis; both of whom see significant cluster alignments out to $\simeq30\mpc$ and beyond in the Abell \& Lick catalogues of clusters. Our findings are consistent with other searches for cluster alignments that do not involve these catalogues.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.