Paper detail

Cluster Ages to Reconstruct the Milky Way Assembly (CARMA). II. The age-metallicity relation of Gaia-Sausage-Enceladus globular clusters

We present the age determination of 13 globular clusters dynamically associated with the Gaia-Sausage-Enceladus (GSE) merger event, as part of the CARMA project effort to trace the Milky Way assembly history. We used deep and homogeneous archival $Hubble$ $Space$ $Telescope$ data, and applied isochrone-fitting to derive homogeneous age estimates. We find that the majority of the selected clusters form a well-defined age-metallicity relation, with a few outliers. Among these, NGC 288 and NGC 6205 are more than 2 Gyr older than the other GSE globular clusters at similar metallicity, and are therefore interpreted as of likely in-situ origin. Moreover, NGC 7099 is somewhat younger than the average GSE trend, this suggesting a possible alternative dwarf galaxy progenitor, while NGC 5286 is mildly older, as if its progenitor was characterised by an higher star-formation efficiency. Another remarkable feature of the resulting age-metallicity relation is the presence of two epochs of globular cluster formation, with a duration of $\sim0.3$ Gyr each and separated by $\sim2$ Gyr. These findings are in excellent agreement with the age-metallicity relation of halo field stars found by González-Koda et al., clearly hinting at episodic star-formation in GSE. The age of the two formation epochs is similar to the mean age of the two groups of in-situ globular clusters previously studied by CARMA. These epochs might therefore be precisely pinpointing two important dynamical events that GSE had with the Milky Way during its evolutionary history. Finally, we discuss the correlation between the recent determination of Si and Eu with the clusters age and origin.

preprint2025arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access11 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.