Paper detail

Clumpiness: Time-domain classification of red-giant evolutionary states

Long, high-quality time-series data provided by previous space-missions such as CoRoT and $\mathit{Kepler}$ have made it possible to derive the evolutionary state of red-giant stars, i.e. whether the stars are hydrogen-shell burning around an inert helium core or helium-core burning, from their individual oscillation modes. We utilise data from the $\mathit{Kepler}$ mission to develop a tool to classify the evolutionary state for the large number of stars being observed in the current era of K2, TESS and for the future PLATO mission. These missions provide new challenges for evolutionary state classification given the large number of stars being observed and the shorter observing duration of the data. We propose a new method, $\mathtt{Clumpiness}$, based upon a supervised classification scheme that uses "summary statistics" of the time series, combined with distance information from the Gaia mission to predict the evolutionary state. Applying this to red giants in the APOKASC catalogue, we obtain a classification accuracy of ~91% for the full 4 years of $\mathit{Kepler}$ data, for those stars that are either only hydrogen-shell burning or also helium-core burning. We also applied the method to shorter $\mathit{Kepler}$ datasets, mimicking CoRoT, K2 and TESS achieving an accuracy >91% even for the 27 day time series. This work paves the way towards fast, reliable classification of vast amounts of relatively short-time-span data with a few, well-engineered features.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.