Paper detail

Clumped stellar winds in supergiant high-mass X-ray binaries: X-ray variability and photoionization

The clumping of massive star winds is an established paradigm confirmed by multiple lines of evidence and supported by stellar wind theory. The purpose of this paper is to bridge the gap between detailed models of inhomogeneous stellar winds in single stars and the phenomenological description of donor winds in supergiant high-mass X-ray binaries (HMXBs). We use results from time-dependent hydrodynamical models of the instability in the line-driven wind of a massive supergiant star to derive the time-dependent accretion rate onto a compact object in the Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton approximation. The strong density and velocity fluctuations in the wind result in strong variability of the synthetic X-ray light curves. The model predicts a large scale X-ray variability, up to eight orders of magnitude, on relatively short timescales. The apparent lack of evidence for such strong variability in the observed HMXBs indicates that the details of accretion process act to reduce the variability due to the stellar wind velocity and density jumps. We, also, study the absorption of X-rays in the clumped stellar wind by means of a 2-D stochastic wind model and find that absorption of X-rays changes strongly at different orbital phases. Furthermore, we address the photoionization in the clumped wind, and show that the degree of ionization is affected by the wind clumping. A correction factor for the photoionization parameter is derived. It is shown that the photoionization parameter is reduced by a factor Xi compared to the smooth wind models with the same mass-loss rate, where Xi is the wind inhomogeneity parameter. We conclude that wind clumping must also be taken into account when comparing the observed and model spectra of the photoionized stellar wind.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.