Paper detail

Clump mass function at an early stage of molecular cloud evolution: II. Galactic cloud complexes

The statistical approach for derivation of the clump mass function (ClMF) developed by Donkov, Veltchev & Klessen is put to observational test through comparison with mass distributions of clumps from molecular emission and dust continuum maps of Galactic cloud complexes, obtained by various authors. The results indicate gravitational boundedness of the dominant clump population, with or without taking into account the contribution of their thermal and magnetic energy. The ClMF can be presented by combination of two power-law functions separated by a characteristic mass from about ten to hundreds solar masses. The slope of the intermediate-mass ClMF is shallow and nearly constant (-0.25 \gtrsim Γ_{IM} \gtrsim -0.55) while the high-mass part is fitted by models that imply gravitationally unstable clumps and exhibit slopes in a broader range (-0.9 \gtrsim Γ_{IM} \gtrsim -1.6), centered at the value of the stellar initial mass function (Γ_{HM} \gtreqless -1.3).

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.